Project Development Entry

1. Our team Chemical Device

We came out with an idea to help automate the cooking of soft-boiled eggs.

It will help solve the eggs being overcooked, as the eggs are very delicate to heat.  We have decided to implement a way to remove the hot water from the egg to stop the cooking process from the heat present. 

2. Team Planning, allocation, and execution

In my team, we consist of Chief Executive Officer: Bjorn, Chief Strategy Officer:  Vernon, Chief Operating Officer: Nigel, Chief Financial Officer: Roy.

Here is our finalized BOM:

Here is our initial Gantt chart:

In the end, we did not follow the plan due to sudden changes such as the omicron variant. Hence we had to change our schedule:

 

 

3. Design and Build Process

Design of CAD for 3D printed parts:

https://cp5070-2021-2b02-group3-bjorn.blogspot.com/2022/02/project-development.html

CAD of Valve Disk

CAD of Valve Connection

For the designing and printing of parts, we had to design and print 2 parts for our prototype, valve connection, and disk, 2 of each.

For the valve disk, I created a circle of diameter 50mm, drew 2 smaller circles of diameter 7.6mm and a small rectangle in the middle of dimensions 3.6mm x 5.2mm. Lastly, I extruded the sketch by 5mm.

For the valve connects I drew a larger circle with a diameter of 25.4mm, a middle circle of 12.7mm, and a small circle of 7.6mm. I extruded the outer circle by 5mm, the middle circle by 21.55mm, and left the small circle not extruded.

I designed the middle hole of the valve disk to be the same as the stem of the stepper motor so it fits snugly onto the stepper motor. Since the tube we purchased had an internal diameter of 12.7mm we also designed the outer diameter of the valve connections to be 12.7mm to fit the tube. The holes of the disk were designed to have a sufficient flow rate when water is being drained. The thickness and height of the disk and valve connection were chosen to have a smaller form factor for our valve mechanism.

Hero Shot of CAD

Programming Arduino(Nigel).

https://cp5070-2021-2b02-group3-nigel.blogspot.com/2022/02/project-development.html

We wanted the stepper motor to be able to have a 7 mins delay before turning 90 degrees for 1 min and then turning back to a close position. This will be run when the button on the board is pressed. In order to start, I had to copy and paste the code from the seller's website as it contains the code which allows the motor to move. Then in the void loop, I start off with the Toggle Button code in my Arduino Practical blog (DC Motor part) since I will be using it to run the code. Then I added a delay for 7mins (420000ms). The stepper motor has 2048 steps per revolution so, in order for it to turn around 90 degrees, I added them for a loop. Initial a (number of steps) = 0, a will keep on adding until it reaches 500 steps (90 degrees). Now I have to add the delay for every step and the direction. The minimum delay I found on the website is 2ms per step so I add a delay of 2ms in the for a loop. OneStep(false) is the direction of the step which is defined by the initial code. Currently, it is turning in a clockwise direction. For that, we wanted it to stay at this position for 1 min in order for all the hot water to drain out, and hence we added another delay for 1 min (60000ms). Lastly, we wanted the motor to turn back to its original position, so I copy the first for loop and paste it at the bottom, and changed the direction to anti-clockwise, OneStep(true) to OneStep(false). 

Here is what the code looks like:

File for the code: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15UW6aG8j52MsCDbGREOLuV5RaiDPSKtf/view?usp=sharing

Brainstorming for the prototype(done by me).

For the assembly process, from what Bjorn designed and Nigel coded, my main task that I spent the most time on was to get the prototype working as well as come out with new ideas when the old failed. 

Initially, we were following a different design:

However, due to issues we faced, we had to drop this idea completely. So the team and I started brainstorming. I came out with the idea to try to implement a vacuum and to perhaps use a tap as a start-stop valve.

But the final idea that we implemented was thought of by Vernon. I did a sketch after the idea has been selected and tried to visualize the design:

We spent the next day in school to try to implement the design, such as fabricating the initial tube, mounting of motor, and testing the mechanism:

         

However, the tube we fabricated was proven to not be durable enough, hence in the end we used a straw instead, which meant that we had to rebuild the entire prototype by dismantling it.

Valve Mechnism Schemetic

3D printing of Parts (Done by Vernon)

https://cp5070-2021-2b02-group3-vernon.blogspot.com/2022/02/project-development.html

To use the 3D printer in the workshop we had to book the printer we were going to use. Before going to the workshop to use the printer, Bjorn had sent me the file of the CAD parts he designed. My job was to go to W3 to print and troubleshoot if problems were to arise.

Here is the Cura setting I used for the printer which was the Creality ender-3. I used the same settings for both parts we printed.

A small issue that arose was the sizing of the square was a little too small which we found out after the first print. It was an easy fix as we just need to adjust the length and width of the square.

Here is the photo of the parts printed.

In total, I printed 5 parts. It took slightly more than 4hours to print all 5 parts. The first part was defective as it was the wrong size.

Here is a short timelapse for the Disk.

In the end, we are glad that we completed our prototype:

4. Problems and solutions

After we got our prototype to work, we left it overnight. However, the next day, the stepper motor rusted badly due to the water leakages we suffered in the days before. Luckily, we had a second stepper motor which we were able to switch to.

When faced with water leakage problems in our initial prototype, we added sealant between the potential gaps, however, the added resistance proved too hard for the stepper motors to turn. Hence we had to brainstorm new ideas on the spot(view above).

And initially, we wanted to use a 12v solenoid valve, however, we had to change that idea and design a valve mechanism ourselves.

5. Project Design Files as downloadable files https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cXuNUvqClMpqXbsQs_gDCVzex5HCwjKA?usp=sharing

Hypothesis testing

 HYPOTHESIS TESTING TASK FOR INDIVIDUAL BLOG

 

For this assignment, you will use the DOE experimental data that your practical team have collected both for FULL Factorial and FRACTIONAL Factorial.

DOE PRACTICAL TEAM MEMBERS (fill this according to your DOE practical):

1. Person A (Jun Weng)

2. Person B (Roy)

3. Person C (Adam)

4. Person D (yongjie)

5. Person E (peijie)

 

 

Data collected for FULL factorial design using CATAPULT A (fill this according to your DOE practical result)

: 

 

Data collected for FRACTIONAL factorial design using CATAPULT B (fill this according to your DOE practical result):

 

Jun Weng will use Run #2 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#2 from FULL factorial.

Roy will use Run #3 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#3 from FULL factorial.

Adam will use Run #5 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#5 from FULL factorial.

yongjie will use Run #8 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#8 from FULL factorial.

peijie will use Run #3 from FRACTIONAL factorial and Run#3 from FULL factorial.

 

 

USE THIS TEMPLATE TABLE and fill all the blanks

The QUESTION	The catapult (the ones that were used in the DOE practical) manufacturer needs to determine the consistency of the products they have manufactured. Therefore they want to determine whether CATAPULT A produces the same flying distance of projectile as that of CATAPULT B.
Scope of the test	The human factor is assumed to be negligible. Therefore different user will not have any effect on the flying distance of projectile.   Flying distance for catapult A and catapult B is collected using the factors below: Arm length =  28 cm Start angle = 20 degree Stop angle = 60 degree
Step 1: State the statistical Hypotheses:	State the null hypothesis (H0):   Both catapults A and B has same flying distances of the projectile   State the alternative hypothesis (H1):   Catapults A and B do not have the same flying distances of the projectile
Step 2: Formulate an analysis plan.	Sample size is 8 Therefore t-test will be used.     Since the sign of H1 is ≠, a left/two/right tailed test is used.     Significance level (α) used in this test is 0.05
Step 3: Calculate the test statistic	State the mean and standard deviation of sample catapult A:   nA = 8 runs Mean = 156.4cm Standard Deviation = 3.43cm     State the mean and standard deviation of sample catapult B: nA = 8 runs Mean = 155.325cm Standard Deviation = 4.40cm       Compute the value of the test statistic (t):
Step 4: Make a decision based on result	Type of test (check one only) 1.     Left-tailed test: [ __ ]  Critical value tα = - ______ 2.     Right-tailed test: [ __ ]  Critical value tα =  ______ 3.     Two-tailed test: [✓]  Critical value tα/2 = ± 2.145   Use the t-distribution table to determine the critical value of tα or tα/2   Compare the values of test statistics, t, and critical value(s), tα or ± tα/2   Therefore Ho is accepted.
Conclusion that answer the initial question	Since the null hypothesis is accepted, Both catapults A and B has same flying distances of the projectile
Compare your conclusion with the conclusion from the other team members.   What inferences can you make from these comparisons?